06.02.2009 |
Posted by: Amor
Amor is hosting a weekly discussion about intergenerational politics and relations – specifically regarding Millennials. Check back with us every Tuesday for more.
The single biggest complaint we hear about the Millennials (Generation Y – born 1981-2000) is their sense of entitlement. A “sense of entitlement” is a pejorative term that implies that you are owed something by society and/or the world. The irony isn’t lost on me that those complaining are the same people responsible for raising the Millennials.
Encouraged by interaction with adults from an early age, Millennials were told early and often that their contribution was valuable. Parents and educators placed high demands on them to succeed in academics, athletics, social interaction, world citizenship and acceptance by society. They are motivated by issues of accomplishment, equality, access, and justice in flat world easily accessed through technology – virtually or actually.
Those early influences shaped Millennials entering the workplace who assertively seek more feedback, responsibility, opportunity, and involvement than previous generations. They are the first generation shaping work to fit their lives rather than adapt their lives to the workplace. Much like the Greatest Generation (who gave birth to the Baby Boomers: 1946-1957), the Millennials are going to change the world.
Entitlement? Not hardly. It’s more like responsibility. Millennials are frustrated by the world they have inherited from us. If you listen, you will hear them articulate frustration over the condition of the world: corporate integrity, environmental stewardship, justice and human rights. They are ready to do something about it. The Millennials are equipped and empowered, and the only thing standing in their way is us. Someone smarter than me put it this way, “The Millennials aren’t living in our world; we are living in theirs!”
Leading Millennials is more about you than just on-boarding them to your way of thinking. Whoa! I know! Big change of paradigm. Huge! Maybe the sense of entitlement comes from current leaders thinking they are owed followers? What do you think? Are your frustrations with the Millennials coming from your desire for them to fit into your world?
05.26.2009 |
Posted by: jon
Amor is hosting a weekly discussion about intergenerational politics and relations – specifically regarding Millennials (Millennial (Gen Y) Generation – Birth years: 1981-2000). Check back with us every Tuesday for more.
We have more generations alive at one time than any other point in history. It’s a crossroads that has never been encountered before thanks to better health, better working conditions and better living conditions in the first world. The seven generations are:
- Silent Generation – Birth years: 1901-1924 (Hero/Civic Generation)
- Greatest Generation – Birth years: 1925-1941 (Artist/Adaptive Generation)
- Baby Boomers – Birth years: 1942-1957 (Prophet/Idealist Generation)
- Generation Jones – Birth years: 1958-1963 (Prophet/Idealist Generation) A subset of the Baby Boomers
- Generation X – Birth years: 1964-1980 (Nomad/Reactive Generation)
- Millennial (Gen Y) Generation – Birth years: 1981-2000 (Hero/Civic Generation)
- New Silent Generation – Birth years: 2001-Present (Artist/Adaptive)
You may be curious why we refer to the generation born 1981-2000 as Millennials rather than Generation Y. This is the term by which the majority of this generation identifies with. They graduated from high school or were born around the millennial and identify closely with what that means. Also, the term Gen Y was often associated with “Gen Why?” which referenced their tendency to question “why”. This was perceived as questioning authority rather than what it was: an attempt to gather information.
In their book, “Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069” authors William Strauss and Neil Howe looked at the cyclical nature of generations. They identified four archetypes of generations: Prophet/Idealist, Nomad/Reactive, Hero/Civic, and Artist/Adaptive which repeat throughout the history of America.
Without going into an explanation that you can better get from reading the Strauss and Howe book (and I recommend it highly), it’s enough to recognize that we have seven generations active in our world today with at least two generations sharing similar views on the world and their role in it. As you can see, the Millennial generation is the first generation to repeat the type: Hero/Civic followed by the yet to be named new silent generation who will follow the Artist/Adaptive type. Get ready for change and just a little bit of values conflict.
Now that the first four generations listed are either in retirement or entering retirement in the near future, we will be filling the gaps with those from Gen X and the Millennials. With that in mind, we will be discussing understanding and developing the Millennials for leadership in future posts and the years to come.
Right now we have some interesting times to consider. The generational mix presents both a unique opportunity and a challenge – how do we create leaders when leaders are still leading? Have you intentionally tried to have every generation represented in your leadership structure? Do you see how the generations can collide over values?
“Spiritual Crack” is a term I’ve used to describe my mission trips with Amor Ministries. Growing up in Colorado and going with my youth group to Amor’s Chihuahua location to build a house was the highlight of my year – I had to get my fix.
A lot of us who went on the Amor trips every year became the “Timothy’s” of our church – we went on to full-time ministry. Even those who didn’t end up in full-time ministry incorporate their experience of encountering Christ through the poor in their professional lives.
Yet as impactful as the Amor mission trip was on me and my peers, I refer to it as an Accidental Transformation. If you have been on an Amor trip, you know the transformational possibilities. We were transformed through that week every year, but no one was guiding and forming that transformation for us.
Our mission experience, maybe like yours, only lasted for a week every year. We met once before the trip to sign forms and plan out who was bringing what tools. Then a few of us might share with the church what we did on the Sunday we returned. That was it until the next year.
Does this describe your mission trip experience? Are you counting on just the few days spent in the mission field to provide the transformation you want for your group?
Kara Powell and Brad Griffin with The Fuller Youth Institute have co-authored a book, Deep Justice Journeys, to help you have purposeful transformation in your group. They provide a framework for preparing your group spiritually and culturally for their mission experience and, most importantly, debriefing the experience as it happens and after you return home.
While the Amor trip is an incredible catalyst for transformation, it is just that – a catalyst. It requires you to invest in learning from and applying the lessons from the experience back home.
Deep Justice Journeys gives you 50 experiential activities from which to choose to engage your group. We encourage you to make the most out of mission trip by committing to purposeful transformation. This book will give you the tools to do it.